|
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 10:10
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 23:31 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
Beautiful looking piece of machinery. What is the downfall of using this device for your captures, both audio and video? Other than your not going to end up with an uncompressed file for post processing? What do you get if you just capture with the HDMI ouput port directly to the BM HDMI input? The comb filter in the Crystalio II sounds like it's better than the BM hub. I think the BM hub is only 2D. Just food for thought. Elvis
|
|
|
|
|
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 01:56 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
substance wrote: for ntsc LD Crystalio II definitely has the best comb filter and analog to digital conversion. hld-X0 has a very good s-video output too. BM doesn't support 1080p60 so its going to have to be 720p60 for LD captures. Correct on the BM support. But why do you need BM to support 1080P60? The picture coming out of the X0 is interlaced, so leave it interlaced. You would be capturing an analog signal in NTSC 8bit 4x3 thru the BM? So I guess I'm a little lost here. Are you going to use the Crystalio II for analog to digital conversion? If so, what are you going to get coming out of the HDMI output on the Crystalio II? Is there settings to choose from? Obviously if your already digital from the Crystalio II, your not going to be doing any changes with the BM, basically your going to just pass thru and write. Right? So the 8bit capture is not necessary unless your bypassing the Crystalio II, right? Or is the S-video output on the X-0 the way to go into the BM via the decoder ? Meaning let the comb filter from the X-0 do the work. Guess you have two choices of capture. I'm thinking the X-0 (s-video) => decoder (s-video) => BM , is going to give you the best picture to work with in 8bit YUV 4X3 NTSC uncompressed. That is for picture. Now for sound?? separate captures, what's the work flow? X-0 (Spdif) => decoder (Spdif) => Crystalio II (HDMI) => BM (PCM capture) Process the picture (I like to use Neat Video in Adobe Premiere, do this last before authoring), leave the sound attached from RCA is fine, since your going to be replacing it in the video editor, hopefully Adobe Premiere, line up the new audio captures to the film and dump the old audio RCA after lining up the new separate audio tracks underneath. That's it. What kind of authoring will you do at this point? Guess you could do a few different ones. BR, DVD, etc.
Last edited by elviscaprice on 30 Sep 2013, 03:13, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
|
|
|
naiaru
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 03:05 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 04:51 Posts: 681 Location: United States Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
elviscaprice wrote: substance wrote: for ntsc LD Crystalio II definitely has the best comb filter and analog to digital conversion. hld-X0 has a very good s-video output too. BM doesn't support 1080p60 so its going to have to be 720p60 for LD captures. Correct on the BM support. But why do you need BM to support 1080P60? In fact if I were you I would skip the deinterlace, leave the picture interlaced in 1080i60. You can't scale without deinterlacing so 480i to 1080i essentially means you're deinterlacing it just to interlace it again.
|
|
|
|
|
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 03:08 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
naiaru wrote: elviscaprice wrote: substance wrote: for ntsc LD Crystalio II definitely has the best comb filter and analog to digital conversion. hld-X0 has a very good s-video output too. BM doesn't support 1080p60 so its going to have to be 720p60 for LD captures. Correct on the BM support. But why do you need BM to support 1080P60? In fact if I were you I would skip the deinterlace, leave the picture interlaced in 1080i60. You can't scale without deinterlacing so 480i to 1080i essentially means you're deinterlacing it just to interlace it again. So don't scale, stick with 4:3. Others can scale as needed when they watch, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
naiaru
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 03:11 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 04:51 Posts: 681 Location: United States Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
elviscaprice wrote: naiaru wrote: elviscaprice wrote: Correct on the BM support. But why do you need BM to support 1080P60? In fact if I were you I would skip the deinterlace, leave the picture interlaced in 1080i60. You can't scale without deinterlacing so 480i to 1080i essentially means you're deinterlacing it just to interlace it again. So don't scale, stick with 4:3. That's an issue of aspect ratio. Scaling is enlarging or shrinking the image.
|
|
|
|
|
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 03:47 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
substance wrote: We are dealing with two separate formats here. NTSC LD and Muse LD. Ntsc LD as you know is composite format therefore it needs y/c splitter(comb filter) to turn it into component form. Muse LD is a component format so there is no y/c seperation. Ld player here acts as a transport. It reads the signal and outputs it to decoder. The player does no encoding at all. It is not possible to get any video out of the player alone. Digital audio is burned on the disc just like ntsc LD so the player can retract that information without the decoder. Decoder only has component output with fixed resolution of 1125i analog(1035i visible). Modern equipment see it as 1080i with black borders for the missing % 4 resolution.
Ntsc LD you know how it works. It is 480i composite. You split y/c with comb filter to make it component then deinterlace to make it 480p progresive then upscale to 720p or 1080p. We can grab the signal at any of these points. 1- hld-x0 composite-> bm composite in using bm's comb filter and capture as 480i component signal. 2-hld-x0 svideo->bm svideo in have bm capture 480i component signal. X0 has a superb 3d comb filter. 3-hld-x0 composite-> crystalio 2 composite in. Here you have 2 options. Crystalio 2 has 2 seperate chips for sd deinterlacing. Faroudja fli2300 and gennum vxp. You select which you want to do deinterlacing depend on content. Then output 480p hdmi into BM. 480p is the lowest crystalio will do. Once the video is progressive gennum vxp chip can upscale upto 1080p. But bm will not take 1080p60 so 720p60 here is the optimum.
Question is do you think software will better deinterlace and upscale then faroudja or gennum vxp chips? If yes, svideo from hldx0 into bm is the best. If no, 720p60 hdmi from Crystalio 2 is the best. Crystalio 2 can merge ac-3, dts or pcm audio with picture on its hdmi output.
For example: Star wars phantom menace ep 1 disc. 1-Hld-x0 composite into crystalio 2. 2-Hld-x0 rf out into my lexicon ldd1 rf demodulator then into crystalio 2. 3- crystalio 2 hdmi out into bm shuttle in 720p60 with ac-3 5.1 Thanks Substance for that explanation on Muse, I didn't know that it was a component recording. Interesting. Well, here is how I would capture the picture, knowing what I know now. The BM has a component input on the hub. I would go as follows X0 (component) => BM (component) capture in 1080i 8bit uncompressed. Will the BM software see it this way thru the component inputs? I'm thinking the BM hub doesn't treat component as HD like it does on the H.264. Then you can deinterlace if you want with Adobe Premiere. Personally I would stick with the interlace. You could do both. In answer to your question, I think you should try different setups/flows to see which works best.
|
|
|
|
|
lons_vex
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 10:06 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 03 Oct 2003, 10:06 Posts: 729 Location: at home :p Has thanked: 59 times Been thanked: 61 times
|
substance wrote: I know there is a few other forum members who owns a Crystalio II(or two like me). After much tweaking and adjusting I found the right settings for LD picture. Oh, interesting! I'll give these settings a try later with my X9/VPS3800/Kuro setup.
|
|
|
|
|
seroxx
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 09 Sep 2014, 18:57 |
Honest fan |
|
|
Joined: 30 Apr 2012, 01:54 Posts: 84 Location: Switzerland Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 1 time
|
Hi Substance, thanx for having you around, really! Quote: Video Settings:
Video= -28
Did you mean "Brightness= - 28" ? Quote: Color Temperature: it may work for VXP Gennom but to fight green tint of Faroudja this would look completely different, would it? I found a fast way to eliminate it by treating R offset & gain neutral or evtl. offset until +4 G offset & gain -2 to -3 B offset & gain +4 to +6 There is a slower way: to go with both R's to minus zone to see a green tint even better, then eliminate it with slowly using G to minus and B to plus and then pulling R's into 0 or even + zone again to reach a desired saturation. Quote: User(custom gamma): Great!!! Both VXP and Faroudja. BUT: there is another function connected with this "User IRE" numbers: a Gamma Value. Every time you press on OK after correcting every single IRE number, a Gamma Value for that same Number can also be adjusted. I left it on 0 all the time but do you know what is it's for? I really have to say, on a bigger picture (1,5 meter wide) VXP looks good in colors but detail and homogeneity are unclear and picture looks like sort of "washed". It's like VXP tries to find detail where there is no any on an LD. Faroudja (incl. True Life ON) looks extremely clean, full of strong color, no any deinterlacing artefacts and like a real beautiful painting! It's a real beauty! I know you like VXP better, but maybe on a smaller screen it works...
|
|
|
|
|
seroxx
|
Post subject: Re: Internal Photos of Crystalio II VPS-3800 Pro and VPS-330 Posted: 11 Sep 2014, 13:00 |
Honest fan |
|
|
Joined: 30 Apr 2012, 01:54 Posts: 84 Location: Switzerland Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 1 time
|
kencol wrote: Seroxx, I have to say that the faroudja has a lot of trouble with fine detail and doesn't produce as stable an image as the vxp and I notice it "wobbles" when struggling with fine lines (for example chain mail armour in braveheart) do you notice this as well? Yes I did, but I'm not disturbed by it 'cause it appears only sometimes. About the fine detail: after months of testing several LDs on a big screen (1.5 m < ) tweakining Faroudja True Life, VXP Gennom, Reon and Marvell Q-deo I only can say that if anybody looks for "detail", one should use any HD format please. Detail is not an LD virtue and you may recognize it looking at any wide shots on any LD. LD can not give more resolution than there is. What I find great about LD is that if processed correctly trough Crystalio 2 it can perform maximum of accuracy of given resolution and transfer. I like having a clean LD picture to enjoy it, and thanx for the suggestion, Braveheart was a great choice to enjoy after a long time, and somehow it seems to be appropriate because of next Saturday Thanx to Substance and all that Gamma numbers, I really enjoy my picture, sorry "lively oil painting" now; this is my setting flow: X9 - Crystalio 2 Faroudja True Life 1080p60 - AVR Pioneer Marvell Q-deo YNR set mostly on 2 (this depends on a LD transfer) for de-noising - HD 3D Projector Panasonic PT-AT 5000 Reon processing with automatic or manual H-sharpness and Detail Clarity levels, Color saturation if needed - Wall. I liked VXP on the beginning better before I discovered True Life of Faroudja. Everything changed in seconds. I was bluffed. That Faroudja True Life chip was in my former DLP Projector InFocus 5700 which I loved very much for 10 years. I'm happy to have gotten this quality back! VXP I will probably use for HD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|