|
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 09:56
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
pbiancardi
|
Post subject: The case for 2d comb filters. Posted: 26 Apr 2018, 16:29 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 11 Oct 2015, 16:35 Posts: 555 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 76 times
|
So I have tried a lot of different setups and devices and it seems to me that 2d comb filters might be better overall for LD, thoughts? My current setup is LD player -> Processor #1 (either Crystalio II(3d) or Faroudja DVP-1510(2d))-> Algolith Mosquito -> Lumagen 2144. So processor #1 does comb filtering and deinterlacing, Algolith does DNR and Lumagen does upscaling plus grayscale / color calibration. I seem to prefer the Faroudja with its 2d comb filter as processor #1 and I absolutely prefer the two processor with Algolith over just using the 2144 for everything. I feel that the Faroudja is sharper and cleaner than the others, really curious what everyone else thinks about 2d vs 3d comb filters for LD since 3d is all the rage now. post images
_________________ Sony HIL-C2EX w/ AC3 Sony HIL-C1 w/ AC3 Sony MDP-999
|
|
|
|
|
pbiancardi
|
Post subject: Re: The case for 2d comb filters. Posted: 26 Apr 2018, 18:55 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 11 Oct 2015, 16:35 Posts: 555 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 76 times
|
rein-o wrote: From those pictures I feel the lower crystalio is better on the bleeding of the LED letters but then again you have to take into consideration the 3rd image that is not shown, the one straight with no processes other than the LD itself going into the TV.
Also from my experience a lot has to do with motion rather than still imagery, its nice to get a still picture but these newer and larger TVs have more issues with motion that you notice more from sitting too close to these larger sets when you should be sitting farther away.
As for me I still haven't had a chance to get my theater room/living room setup yet but I do have a TV hooked up with my LDs in the work room to watch some stuff. In motion I prefer the Faroudja, obviously difficult to show in any sort of image or video online. I don't have option 3 as my projector only has HDMI in.
_________________ Sony HIL-C2EX w/ AC3 Sony HIL-C1 w/ AC3 Sony MDP-999
|
|
|
|
|
pbiancardi
|
Post subject: Re: The case for 2d comb filters. Posted: 27 Apr 2018, 14:36 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 11 Oct 2015, 16:35 Posts: 555 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 76 times
|
happycube wrote: That makes sense actually - a 3D comb filter has to fall back to 2D and/or do motion interpolation to "guess", and if the Faroujda does a better job at 2D, it would be better in motion scenes. People spend a lot looking for the magic 3d comb filter when maybe a relatively cheap Faroudja or Extron YCS-100 is as good or better.
_________________ Sony HIL-C2EX w/ AC3 Sony HIL-C1 w/ AC3 Sony MDP-999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|