|
It is currently 21 Jul 2026, 02:07
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
rein-o
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 05 Aug 2025, 23:48 |
| Jedi Master |
 |
 |
Joined: 03 May 2004, 19:05 Posts: 8437 Location: Dullaware Has thanked: 1470 times Been thanked: 1011 times
|
danszld1138 wrote: rein-o wrote: The poster to Angry Red Planet was so cool when I first saw it as a kid, then I saw the film.......... In follow-up, I did watch The Angry Red Planet the next day and was not impressed with the quality of the transfer, etc. The crew of the spaceship was 5 people and the rocket had 12 foot ceilings (or higher). These 50s sci-fi movies are bad and I'm not saying that as a modern (post-Jaw) viewer. I think hat they are terrible no matter what time they were made or what kind of people are watching them. The planet effect was OK. The "solarization" look was an interesting film process for the planet. The next disc I watched was a laser rotted one, but the movie was actually quite good.  First off, this disc was terribly rotted. A blurry and miserable transfer, the dialogue was hard to understand and they were British, which didn't help. Maybe I need better speakers. The disc audio started getting static about 25 minutes into each side and white speckle streaks danced across the picture while the audio went staticky. Is laserdisc rot related to the adhesive squeezing out between the layers? It took a while just to rub what felt like rubber cement off the circumference with the palm of my hand. I reported this disc as a rotter. It was poorly stored, though and I knew it going in. Four stars You can clean this off and the disc should play fine, search up sticky edges, there are a few topics. Unless the disc actually has rot then that's another issue.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
takeshi666
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 10 Mar 2026, 15:30 |
| Jedi Candidate |
 |
 |
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 02:41 Posts: 2152 Location: Finland Has thanked: 239 times Been thanked: 476 times
|
signofzeta wrote: Any wide version of that movie is stupid. Ever seen the Reconstructed DVD? If the answer is "no" then believe me, you have no idea how stupid it can get.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
moviecollect1994
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 31 Mar 2026, 00:42 |
| Shows curiousity |
 |
 |
Joined: 31 Mar 2026, 00:06 Posts: 19 Location: United States Has thanked: 23 times Been thanked: 4 times
|
k-mox wrote: Watched robocop over the weekend  Nice, I have the first Robocop on DVD, now I'm planning to get the Laserdisc for it. Me personally, I'm a collector VHS, DVD and down the line Laserdisc.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
danszld1138
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 05 Jun 2026, 22:43 |
| Serious fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 18 Jun 2025, 23:54 Posts: 149 Location: SE MI Has thanked: 96 times Been thanked: 60 times
|
Tonight’s feature presentation is a Classic: Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981) [ML100109] In glorious pan & scan and magnificent two-channel stereo, this Bo Derek smash hit features writing and pictures and crazy chimp action (of some kind). Rated an incredible 3.5 out of 10 on IMDB, this Movie was so good, those who saw it said they will remember it so fondly, they will never need to see it again. Hey, they can’t all be winners. Update: This was definitely not a winner. (Moves disc to the sell pile…)
_________________ DanSz LD Collection
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skyjedi2020
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 05 Jul 2026, 02:31 |
| Serious fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 04 Jun 2020, 09:46 Posts: 162 Location: United States Has thanked: 94 times Been thanked: 40 times
|
|
I watched the new He-Man movie. But was just okay. Where it references the tv series it does well. But a little too jokey. Its a bit of disaster for Amazon only making 100 million. I also saw Mando and Grogu the worst Star Wars movie ever made. I only liked the stop motion by Phil Tippett. I liked Jabba's son as a good guy that was unexpected. But it's like 4 filler episodes of a tv series. And the absurd ending where Dave Filoni and Sigourney Weaver are pilots in the new republic bombing the Hutts.
Mando himself is like a nonentity like you are watching someone play with their action figures.
I haven't finished Gunn Superman yet, what I watched I did not enjoy.
Supergirl I've been hearing terrible things about and some mixed.
Maul the Shadow Lord was okay as a cartoon but I'm not convinced Filoni is anything but a cartoon showrunner. The Vader/Maul fight was lame not peak.
I haven't liked any of Disney Star Wars except for the odd episode of Star Wars Visions. The Ronin. And that was very Kurosawa influenced.
I hate JJ Abrams Force Awakens and the Rise of Skywalker. Funnily enough Star Trek 2009 may not be a good Star Trek film, but its very entertaining minus the lens flares and all the stupidity of the way it neatly gets all the crew together in one place.
The casting is never the problem in JJ films, its always the pacing or lack of it, the writing. His style over substance. Mystery boxes. Lens flares, Shaking camera. Snap zooms. Dutch angles. He has tried to absorb Rod Serling, Alfred Hitchcock, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg into his work. He has none of their strengths. and nothing of his own to recommend him. no auteur work. it's always a remix of someone's else's idea or work. some homage. pastiche. a remake a requel. I despise Hollywood so much for such legacy sequels. the bad Ghostbusters, Star Wars and Jurassic Park retreads. I'm surprised they didn't remake Rocky.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
pokefraker
|
Post subject: Re: What have you been watching?  Posted: 05 Jul 2026, 08:33 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 06:39 Posts: 367 Location: Boston Has thanked: 450 times Been thanked: 204 times
|
skyjedi2020 wrote: I hate JJ Abrams Force Awakens and the Rise of Skywalker. Funnily enough Star Trek 2009 may not be a good Star Trek film, but its very entertaining minus the lens flares and all the stupidity of the way it neatly gets all the crew together in one place.
The casting is never the problem in JJ films, its always the pacing or lack of it, the writing. His style over substance. Mystery boxes. Lens flares, Shaking camera. Snap zooms. Dutch angles. He has tried to absorb Rod Serling, Alfred Hitchcock, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg into his work. He has none of their strengths. and nothing of his own to recommend him. no auteur work. it's always a remix of someone's else's idea or work. some homage. pastiche. a remake a requel. I despise Hollywood so much for such legacy sequels. the bad Ghostbusters, Star Wars and Jurassic Park retreads. I'm surprised they didn't remake Rocky. Not a huge fan of anything that JJ has made personally (Star Trek trilogy is *fine*) but I will forever be grateful that we got a proper 4k transfer of Phantasm thanks to him and it being his favorite movie. Also we did get Rocky legacy sequels, and while I haven't seen them I believe the general opinion is that the Creed movies are pretty solid.
_________________ You know, excuse me, this is, a damn fine cup of coffee.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|