|
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 11:53
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Post subject: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 05:00 |
|
Hello everyone! Last week, I bought a CLD-D503 with 25 movies for $90 shipped. I thought I got a pretty good deal, but then I found a CLD-605 with 47 movies, and won that one as well for a little under $100 shipped! I would have bought just the lot of movies for that price, so the player was basically a freebie. I'm just curious if anyone knows; which one should I set up? Any difference in video/audio quality between the two? Any and all help would be appreciated, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 10:02 |
|
Thanks for the advice, but I don't actually have a surround setup, so I'm not quite sure whether or not any of the audio features would really serve much of a purpose to me. Any other features that make the 605 a better product?
|
|
|
|
|
disclord
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 16:22 |
Absolute fan |
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2010, 21:12 Posts: 1616 Location: Plattsburg, Missouri. USA Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 11 times
|
rein-o wrote: i only have a 2 channel setup but my player has all the audio outs. since you got them both cheap i would just test them side by side to see which you like better to control etc. and then keep the other one since you didn't pay that much for it.
i like the jog shuttle on players but my player is too new and they didn't make one on mine. i've never had either of the players you have, but if i kept one out to play i would use the jog shuttle D503 it's fun to use. Since you are a 2 channel person, I highly recommend that you try a Hughes brand SRS processor. Unlike the current SRS system, the 2 Hughes units are true audiophile units - even The Absolute Sound and The Perfect Vision used them. And the AK-100 and Hughes Retriver (without the display) can be bought cheaply on eBay. The effect is amazing and not at all fake since the processes uses only the natural spatial cues in the audio and adds nothing synthetic.
_________________ Visit my site LaserVision Landmarks http://www.LaserVisionLandmarks.com
|
|
|
|
|
signofzeta
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 18:54 |
Jedi Knight |
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2010, 09:44 Posts: 5988 Location: Ann Arbor Has thanked: 1292 times Been thanked: 1106 times
|
facemeat wrote: Thanks for the advice, but I don't actually have a surround setup, so I'm not quite sure whether or not any of the audio features would really serve much of a purpose to me. Any other features that make the 605 a better product? In that case I would use the 500 series since its more durable. My 604 came with the best Pioneer remote CU-CLD114 but my 503 came with a crappy little one. Pioneer remotes are almost %100 universal among the players, so pick whichever remote you like the most. Whichever one you put in storage, make sure you fire it up every once in a while to keep things from getting stuck.
_________________ All about LD care, inner sleeves, shrink wrap, etc.
https://youtu.be/b3O-vHpHRpM
|
|
|
|
|
rein-o
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 20 Aug 2012, 15:37 |
Jedi Master |
|
|
Joined: 03 May 2004, 19:05 Posts: 8106 Location: Dullaware Has thanked: 1219 times Been thanked: 844 times
|
elahrairrah wrote: In addition to the audio extras that the 605 has, it also has Digital Frame Memory which the 503 doesn't have. So you can freeze fram your CLV discs. then you would really want to use the D605 and put the other away for a spair
|
|
|
|
|
disclord
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 20 Aug 2012, 16:55 |
Absolute fan |
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2010, 21:12 Posts: 1616 Location: Plattsburg, Missouri. USA Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 11 times
|
rein-o wrote: Wow, I had totally forgotten about that post - it made SRS decoder prices spike on eBay for a month or so. My main audio passion in quad is the Fosgate Tate II 101A SQ Surround decoder which uses true analog multipliers in the Matrix Multiplier section to enhance the separation of the SQ Quad Matrix.
_________________ Visit my site LaserVision Landmarks http://www.LaserVisionLandmarks.com
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 20 Aug 2012, 19:12 |
|
You'll find the 503 is more substantial mechanically however the 605 has more features. Plus the 605 won't suffer from disc slip as the rubber on the disc table is not a "stick on" mat like the 503 type chassis uses. The 605 rubber won't harden like the 503 will. In any case it is a good idea to break out the back up player every now and again and load and spin a disc just so it doesn't get tired
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Re: CLD-D605 vs. CLD-D503 Posted: 21 Aug 2012, 05:31 |
|
elahrairrah wrote: In addition to the audio extras that the 605 has, it also has Digital Frame Memory which the 503 doesn't have. So you can freeze fram your CLV discs. Well, looks like I'm going with the 605 then. Thanks again for all the help, everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|