|
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 02:01
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
forper
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 19 Sep 2016, 01:40 |
Absolute fan |
|
|
Joined: 01 May 2016, 06:38 Posts: 2040 Location: Australia Has thanked: 334 times Been thanked: 222 times
|
elieb wrote: not me, i see 4K as a waste, a market gimmick. Hell, my mom is always telling me that "the human eye and brain can't process that, we went from 60hz to 120, to 240, it's NUTS" the difference is only noticeable with a 65" or larger television set.
i won't be making the jump. i didn't make the jump to front wide/front height, atmos or those new surround modes. I'm with you. I keep regressing more and more in time. I actually find a low res image much more pleasing to my eye. I haven't even "upgraded" to 5.1 audio, just want the best 2ch stereo I can get.
_________________ SONY MDP-355GX, DVDO iscan VP50, SONY KVHR-M36
|
|
|
|
|
svwees
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 19 Sep 2016, 15:29 |
Serious fan |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jun 2006, 18:20 Posts: 222 Location: Netherlands Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 2 times
|
forper wrote: elieb wrote: not me, i see 4K as a waste, a market gimmick. Hell, my mom is always telling me that "the human eye and brain can't process that, we went from 60hz to 120, to 240, it's NUTS" the difference is only noticeable with a 65" or larger television set.
i won't be making the jump. i didn't make the jump to front wide/front height, atmos or those new surround modes. I'm with you. I keep regressing more and more in time. I actually find a low res image much more pleasing to my eye. I haven't even "upgraded" to 5.1 audio, just want the best 2ch stereo I can get. Then good vinyl on a high end turntable and stylus will will deliver a good job imho. As for 4K, i like the extended gamut, though rather have liked more primaries besides RGB (no, not like that quattron where they shine Red/Green onto an extra yellow phosphor, but 6 true primaries See the problem with wide gamut on only the so called "RGB" (which is actually not RGB, but more close to scarlet, chartreuse and azur) ). The 2nd thing i like about 4K has more to do with to be able to view .MPO 3D photos and 3D video on a passive 4K screen in an enjoyable way. On a 1080P 3D screen, with passive, it is like looking through venetian blinds, if you sit up close. You loose half the resolution for each eye. With active 3D, you need more equipment that can drive that and despite high refresh rates can be strainful to one's eyes. With passive 3D on a 4K screen, it is a nice compromise of all of those. I would like to see a 4K 3D screen smaller than 55" though.
_________________ My Laserdiscs Philips CDV 185, Pioneer D925/D515/PD 707V, Sony CDP 301V, Yamaha CDV S100/CDV M777
|
|
|
|
|
forper
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 20 Sep 2016, 03:17 |
Absolute fan |
|
|
Joined: 01 May 2016, 06:38 Posts: 2040 Location: Australia Has thanked: 334 times Been thanked: 222 times
|
svwees wrote: Then good vinyl on a high end turntable and stylus will will deliver a good job imho.
I will stick with CD for a number of reasons.
_________________ SONY MDP-355GX, DVDO iscan VP50, SONY KVHR-M36
|
|
|
|
|
confederate
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 20 Oct 2016, 03:44 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 23 Jun 2013, 02:37 Posts: 726 Location: Germany Has thanked: 116 times Been thanked: 60 times
|
substance wrote: alien wrote: substance wrote: in short, no the audio is not improved. you get the same lossy yesteryears audio on todays 4K video. Even Laserdisc or DVD audio is better than streaming audio.
That is a huge problem with Netflix. I just find the audio quality to be of poor quality. I am having huge issues with their Dolby Digital Plus audio tracks. The voices sound distorted at times and that is really really irritating. I know this has been reported by many other people but all Netflix keeps telling their users that it is a problem with their AVR however that is not possible as I am not having these issues with the Dolby Digital Plus tracks I heard on HD DVD or Blu Ray. And not all movies / series appear to be affected by this problem. This really sucks. Laserdisc audio is excellent. Netflix's stereo audio tracks suck a**, too.
|
|
|
|
|
elahrairrah
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 16 Dec 2016, 17:03 |
Young Padawan |
|
|
Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 15:38 Posts: 3419 Location: New Jersey Has thanked: 79 times Been thanked: 143 times
|
I got my first 4K title this past Tuesday . . . . . . usually like getting Best Buy's Steelbook releases, and this one happened to have the 4K version in it. I guess I'll get a 4K player once I can find a reasonably priced "region-free" 4K player. And a display that can output 4K resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
substance
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 09 Apr 2017, 21:48 |
Confirmed Padawan |
|
|
Joined: 16 May 2009, 18:05 Posts: 3588 Location: California, USA Has thanked: 28 times Been thanked: 323 times
|
nissling wrote: I got to see a couple of UHD-BDs on a Sony VPL-VW500ES earlier this year including Ghostbusters II, Independence Day and The Maze Runner. Although it was the first-gen 4K projector by Sony and missing both HDR as well as 10 bit color depth, picture quality was overall much more solid than regular Blu-rays in every single regard. Hopefully Warner will release Blade Runner later this year to finally replace their nearly ten year old Blu-Ray.
As soon as I get home Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk from the U.S. we'll arrange another evening. 500es is a 9ghz design. I am curious how it's going to handle Billy Lynn which is a native 2160p60 title. 2160p60 12bit 4:2:2 needs a 18ghz chipset. I am curious how the player is going to behave for this title. It could do 2160p60 8bit 4:2:0 perhaps or downscale to 1080p60 .
_________________ Coming Soon Derman Labs Anything Of Substance
|
|
|
|
|
acuozzo
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 11 Apr 2017, 00:17 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 08 Jan 2013, 18:13 Posts: 320 Location: United States Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 5 times
|
forper wrote: Yep, another reason LD is the perfect format and the modern mass market sucks and people have no discernment anymore. Just stick with LD. People didn't during the time of LD either. VHS didn't die in the US until 2005. And with that being said… PQ and AQ aside, VHS managed to have some features that all subsequent home video formats lack: 1. Can be kept in crappy conditions for extended periods of time. No special storage scheme or furniture is required. Stacking is fine even to great heights. 2. No special handling is required. Tapes can be loaded with " monkey feet" into a VCR without significant risk of damage. 3. Can be handled by children without significant risk of damage. 4. Tapes can be repaired (or, hell, even edited if a section is too damaged to leave in) by anyone with scissors, scotch tape, and the gumption to pop one open.
_________________ Fill my eyes with that DiscoVision!
|
|
|
|
|
signofzeta
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 11 Apr 2017, 01:42 |
Jedi Knight |
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2010, 09:44 Posts: 5988 Location: Ann Arbor Has thanked: 1292 times Been thanked: 1106 times
|
VHS has its own special kind of durability. It's extremely resistant to outright abuse, true, but as someone who doesn't abuse stuff he paid money for I don't find that very useful.
Magnetism is a pretty serious weakness, as is mechanical wear. I've worn out VHS myself before, and when I worked at a rental store in the 90s we had MANY breakage issues. I know because I taped back together a million pornos and copies of Homeward Bound or Forest Gump. You can blame bad VCRs, but bad VCRs are part of the reality of VHS so that would be stupid, IMO. Meanwhile I've never worn out a CD/LD/BR because it's impossible and I've never had a cheap or dirty player destroy one. I *have* loaned out a VHS tape and had it come back unplayable despite looking perfect to the human eye.
Btw, my kid just turned 2 the other day and he can now use DVDs without even getting finger prints on them. I gave him his own collection, starting with one $5 Loony Toons DVD. He eventually destroyed it so I had to replace it but now I let him load my $100 BRs for me with no worry.
Of course, his collection and the main one are separated because he is only 2 and would trash everything for sure if he had full access to the library. However, with his own stuff I let him practice, a lot, he can access the TV, player, and his DVDs whenever he wants and he's good at it. If a two year old can do this then I can't understand why a grown-ass man can't avoid ruining his optical media. It really isn't that hard.
Regardless, I understand that the point you were making is that sometimes a new format is so shiny and new that you don't realize how much crappier it is than the outgoing stuff in many key ways. For example, a lot of lame DVD players don't have any kind of resume feature. If you eject the disc in many players, maybe you just bumped the button, you now have to sit through all the ads and FBI things as the dumb POS loads it all again and you try to find where you were on the disc. VHS has resume built in. If you take it out of the player it stays wound to the same point forever as a fundamental aspect of its design.
Of course anyone who uses LD and DVD/BR on a regular basis is reminded of this all the time. The convinence and response and control of LD are unrivaled. DVD BR were a massive massive downgrade from LD in those departments. On LD you can never be forced to watch a segment. You could play anything that was NTSC in an NTSC deck regardless of where it was intended for sale. You could copy it at will. You could, at *any* time the disc was playing instantly go to any other part of it, skip any part of it. If you were trying to understand a specific special effect or a killer drum solo you could A-B repeat that segment forever. If you have a music video compilation with one bad song on it you could program it out.
The new stuff...you don't control it, the studio does. It takes forever to do what it does do, is region locked, sells you crap, threatens you with PRISON before you've even watched the movie. Yeah. PRISON. My kid wants to watch some Marry Poppins but first he has to sit through an unskipable single frame movie from the FBI about how if you copy this for your friends you may GO TO PRISON. It's such an uplifting thing, thanks FBI.
_________________ All about LD care, inner sleeves, shrink wrap, etc.
https://youtu.be/b3O-vHpHRpM
|
|
|
|
|
msgohan
|
Post subject: Re: First 6 titles for 4K UHD announced, they are lmao Posted: 12 Apr 2017, 05:46 |
Serious fan |
|
|
Joined: 15 Jan 2013, 22:44 Posts: 136 Location: Canada Has thanked: 5 times Been thanked: 1 time
|
signofzeta wrote: The new stuff...you don't control it, the studio does. It takes forever to do what it does do, is region locked UHD BD is region free, so at least we won back a small measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|