|
It is currently 04 Jul 2024, 06:40
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
 |
|
 |
|
|
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 07 Apr 2013, 22:51 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
jpass992 wrote: f you want the best SVHS deck, you don't get a Panasonic. Panasonic images are just too soft, or too grainy. The best image your going to get is out of JVC decks. My favorite deck that does the best is the JVC HR S6900U. Even some of the later JVC decks are good such as the SR V101US as they have the built in TBC. I would kindly disagree with you. Many conversations about images style/quality between the Panasonic AG 1980P and other JVC's. It would seem that the images are slightly softer in the JVC's as I have found. I like the DNR/TBC in the Panasonic AG 1980P which tends to almost overdue the sharpness to a point of plasticity. That is just fine because when I go to remaster the image with Adobe Premier using the Neat Video plugin it will get softened and cleaned up. No VCR has a true TBC. They are mainly line TBC's. Thus when I do have skipped frames, picture jitter or any noise not attributed to flagging, then I will use a TBC between the Panasonic AG 1980P and my black magic hub. The good thing about the TBC is what noise it does add (but corrects some other major ones) gets taken out with Neat Video plugin. I've gotten some fantastic finalized captures from VHS both NTSC and PAL that rival my average LD captures.  Elvis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cpix
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 08 Apr 2013, 11:19 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 11 May 2009, 11:12 Posts: 270 Location: Norway Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
elviscaprice wrote: jpass992 wrote: f you want the best SVHS deck, you don't get a Panasonic. Panasonic images are just too soft, or too grainy. The best image your going to get is out of JVC decks. My favorite deck that does the best is the JVC HR S6900U. Even some of the later JVC decks are good such as the SR V101US as they have the built in TBC. I would kindly disagree with you. Many conversations about images style/quality between the Panasonic AG 1980P and other JVC's. It would seem that the images are slightly softer in the JVC's as I have found. I like the DNR/TBC in the Panasonic AG 1980P which tends to almost overdue the sharpness to a point of plasticity. That is just fine because when I go to remaster the image with Adobe Premier using the Neat Video plugin it will get softened and cleaned up. No VCR has a true TBC. They are mainly line TBC's. Thus when I do have skipped frames, picture jitter or any noise not attributed to flagging, then I will use a TBC between the Panasonic AG 1980P and my black magic hub. The good thing about the TBC is what noise it does add (but corrects some other major ones) gets taken out with Neat Video plugin. I've gotten some fantastic finalized captures from VHS both NTSC and PAL that rival my average LD captures.  Elvis couldn't agree more! I have tested a bunch of svhs players against each other, and the ag-1980 seems to come out of it as the best player each time. From some video captures i've seen, the last high-end jvc dvhs player do a better job, but the common jvc svhs players doesn't match up to the detail level the ag1980 outputs
_________________ Pioneer KURO KRP-500M, Crystalio 2 VPS3300, Lumagen 2144, HLD-X9
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 09 Apr 2013, 04:41 |
|
|
elviscaprice wrote: jpass992 wrote: f you want the best SVHS deck, you don't get a Panasonic. Panasonic images are just too soft, or too grainy. The best image your going to get is out of JVC decks. My favorite deck that does the best is the JVC HR S6900U. Even some of the later JVC decks are good such as the SR V101US as they have the built in TBC. I would kindly disagree with you. Many conversations about images style/quality between the Panasonic AG 1980P and other JVC's. It would seem that the images are slightly softer in the JVC's as I have found. I like the DNR/TBC in the Panasonic AG 1980P which tends to almost overdue the sharpness to a point of plasticity. That is just fine because when I go to remaster the image with Adobe Premier using the Neat Video plugin it will get softened and cleaned up. No VCR has a true TBC. They are mainly line TBC's. Thus when I do have skipped frames, picture jitter or any noise not attributed to flagging, then I will use a TBC between the Panasonic AG 1980P and my black magic hub. The good thing about the TBC is what noise it does add (but corrects some other major ones) gets taken out with Neat Video plugin. I've gotten some fantastic finalized captures from VHS both NTSC and PAL that rival my average LD captures.  Elvis Well, for some home videos recorded on other decks, Panasonic can be better. However, the other day, I recorded a song from the Lion King on LD from my D701. Played it back on two machines: a JVC HR S6900U and a Panasonic AG 1970. The HR S6900U had more vibrant colors than the 1970. The 1970 was duller, regardless of the setting the slider was in. Another tape I did a comparison on is a family members tape I'm dubbing and the PQ looked better on the 1970 than the 6900U simply because of that slider. I've onwed JVCs and Panasonics and JVCs have always had the best PQ (If hooked up to a CRT of course). Don't get me wrong, Panasonics can be good, but the way I've seen it, JVCs have faster transport mechs and better PQ than Panasonics. I even owned the Panasonic AG 5710 once, and overall, I wasn't that impressed. I will admit that the Search sound feature on Panasonics is cool though. Even better than a 1980, a deck you outta check out is a JVC SR W5U. I wish I had a fully functioning unit, but right off the bat, the PQ did look better than the Panasonics.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
acuozzo
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 09 Apr 2013, 15:26 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 08 Jan 2013, 18:13 Posts: 320 Location: United States Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 5 times
|
elahrairrah wrote: I have a Panasonic S-VHS deck that is a rebadged JVC. That should tell you something. Panasonic's best gear is usually a fluke, but also usually developed entirely in-house. I have most of the Panasonic flukes. S-VHS: Panasonic AG-1980 LD: Panasonic LX-900 DVD Recorder: Panasonic DMR-ES10 The DMR-ES10 has a frame-sync in its video processor IC that can fully stabilize even the mostly wobbly signals from 2nd+ generation VHS tapes. It's amazing!
_________________ Fill my eyes with that DiscoVision!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elviscaprice
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 10 Apr 2013, 18:09 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 23:23 Posts: 389 Location: Costa Rica Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
jpass992 wrote: elviscaprice wrote: jpass992 wrote: f you want the best SVHS deck, you don't get a Panasonic. Panasonic images are just too soft, or too grainy. The best image your going to get is out of JVC decks. My favorite deck that does the best is the JVC HR S6900U. Even some of the later JVC decks are good such as the SR V101US as they have the built in TBC. I would kindly disagree with you. Many conversations about images style/quality between the Panasonic AG 1980P and other JVC's. It would seem that the images are slightly softer in the JVC's as I have found. I like the DNR/TBC in the Panasonic AG 1980P which tends to almost overdue the sharpness to a point of plasticity. That is just fine because when I go to remaster the image with Adobe Premier using the Neat Video plugin it will get softened and cleaned up. No VCR has a true TBC. They are mainly line TBC's. Thus when I do have skipped frames, picture jitter or any noise not attributed to flagging, then I will use a TBC between the Panasonic AG 1980P and my black magic hub. The good thing about the TBC is what noise it does add (but corrects some other major ones) gets taken out with Neat Video plugin. I've gotten some fantastic finalized captures from VHS both NTSC and PAL that rival my average LD captures.  Elvis Well, for some home videos recorded on other decks, Panasonic can be better. However, the other day, I recorded a song from the Lion King on LD from my D701. Played it back on two machines: a JVC HR S6900U and a Panasonic AG 1970. The HR S6900U had more vibrant colors than the 1970. The 1970 was duller, regardless of the setting the slider was in. Another tape I did a comparison on is a family members tape I'm dubbing and the PQ looked better on the 1970 than the 6900U simply because of that slider. I've onwed JVCs and Panasonics and JVCs have always had the best PQ (If hooked up to a CRT of course). Don't get me wrong, Panasonics can be good, but the way I've seen it, JVCs have faster transport mechs and better PQ than Panasonics. I even owned the Panasonic AG 5710 once, and overall, I wasn't that impressed. I will admit that the Search sound feature on Panasonics is cool though. Even better than a 1980, a deck you outta check out is a JVC SR W5U. I wish I had a fully functioning unit, but right off the bat, the PQ did look better than the Panasonics. Again, I would kindly disagree with your assessment on the Panasonic SVHS players. That Panasonic AG 1970 is a much different player than the 1980. The 1970 is an excellent player known for it's great transport that can work miracles with home made videos or commercial thin tapes. Of course playing back a tape on the original SVHS player that taped it is always preferable. The 1970 lacks the DNR/TBC found on the 1980. I will say this much. No SVHS player does it all. Especially when you start capturing a variety of home made tapes. A variety of SVHS players both JVC and Panasonic will help you find the best image for you. But overall for commercial tapes, which is what I am interested in, the Panasonic SVHS AG-1980 fulfills my needs the best. PAL version Panasonic NV-FS 200. CPIX, interesting assessment on that JVC dvhs player.  Never tried one. How reliable are the units?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
nikita70
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 08 May 2013, 04:41 |
| Serious fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 12 Apr 2012, 03:35 Posts: 230 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 0 time
|
|
Bottom line for VHS, IMO, looking back now, no they weren't great but I grew up with them. We got our first VHS VCR in either '82 or '83. Quasar top loader. We rented Conan the Barbarian, it was the bomb, me and my brother were so stoked we watched it 3 times in 2 days. I'm 43, younger people today do not realize that back then, if it wasn't on TV, you just didn't watch it. The VCR revolutioned home entertainment. It is what made it possible to have a choice other than what was on the TV. So I will always look back on VHS with fond memories. And still watch tapes today.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elahrairrah
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 18 Jun 2013, 16:30 |
| Young Padawan |
 |
 |
Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 15:38 Posts: 3429 Location: New Jersey Has thanked: 82 times Been thanked: 159 times
|
Might as well put this here rather than make a new thread. Found this article on a video store closing and it brought back another wave of nostalgia for me . . . The day the video store diedQuote: Nostalgia lines the shelves in Videoscope, Mountain View's last video rental store. The sentiment overwhelms upon entering the storeroom, where navigating the clutter of racks and boxes that swell with films of every era and genre seems impossible without a map -- or your neighborhood video clerk.
Going to the video store is, after all, a hands-on experience. For those whose memories extend back before the era of Netflix, the sheer kinesthetic involvement of renting a movie requires a certain level of commitment. Not just to movies, or even to the customer-service interaction, but to a dying medium.
Videoscope, located at 2290 W. El Camino Real, is the latest victim, following in the footsteps of video rental franchises Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. While outliving local competitors, years of steadily decreasing revenues followed by a proposed rent increase have convinced owners Nona and Odon Sy to shut down operations at the end of this month.
The closing is tentatively set for June 22.
This news came as a huge blow to the store's fiercely loyal customer base. "Technology has killed another time-honored institution," says longtime customer Kathy Graham.
Graham first visited the store in 1982, the year of Videoscope's inception, at its original Palo Alto location. Nona Sy was a Filipino emigre with a collection of 50 horror films on VHS, years before cassettes had fully reached American homes.
"I told my husband, 'Why don't we open a store and make them available to all people?'" Sy said. "We bought everything over the years. We own every one of these tapes."
The store moved to Los Altos in 1996 and to Mountain View in 2002. As the collection of titles expanded to the thousands, operations within the store grew to include Sy's husband, Odon, who had been let go from his job as an engineer. For the next three decades, the couple set about spreading the joy of cinema in the form of VHS, LaserDisc, and DVD rentals.
"Those were very good years," Odon says. "Fantastic years."
It was not built to last, according to Odon. Although the business achieved local notoriety for its extensive LaserDisc collection, the large, record-shape disc never really replaced the success of the VHS. When the smaller, higher-resolution DVD was introduced, Odon says, "The studios loved it."
Immediately, the LaserDisc was killed, a decision that had two consequences. First, it set a precedent by which a cinematic medium can be swiftly eliminated. Second, the DVD was digital, meaning it can be copied illegally. Reminds me of this one video store I used to go to, "Hollywood Video" (not the national chain, this was a mom-and-pop) that had a large store in this one little plaza that rented VHS and a pretty extensive LD selection. In '99 they moved to a much smaller store, and all the LDs were gone. Talked to the owner and he was thinking of selling them. I gave him my phone number to call me if he ever wanted to sell. Never called me though. They had a huge VHS collection like this Videoscope place did. Tapes were stacked tightly so they could pack more into their little store: Beryl Yaffa picks out both VHS tapes and DVDs looking for historical films and documentaries during Videoscope's closing sale, June 11, 2013Ahhhh, those were the days. But thanks to Netflix and Redbox, they're gone.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elahrairrah
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 19 Jul 2013, 20:02 |
| Young Padawan |
 |
 |
Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 15:38 Posts: 3429 Location: New Jersey Has thanked: 82 times Been thanked: 159 times
|
apocbooks wrote: I'm actually a big fan of VHS. I have built up quite the hoard due to a local thrift store chain selling them for 10cents each. At some point I'll probably donate a lot back so I can make some room in my closet.
Some of the later 90s releases look really good on a CRT. I also like that I can just stop a movie and pick it up weeks later at the exact point I left off. With optical formats you have to remember where you were. Some players have the "Last Memory" function, where you can store where you left off on several discs. Even my CLD-R7G LD player can store where you left off for one disc. But yeah, VHS is always where you left off.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
apocbooks
|
Post subject: Re: VHS  Posted: 19 Jul 2013, 20:38 |
| Knows how to post |
 |
 |
Joined: 02 Jul 2013, 16:51 Posts: 12 Location: United States Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
|
naiaru wrote: I went to Videoscope's closing sale and just thought I'd mention that that massive library of VHS you see in that photo spanned almost that entire wall (the photo starts about 2/3 down I think) and was not alphabetized. It looks like it was a great store. I love those places that just put the stuff on the shelf and move on, but then again I'm a browser and rarely look for anything specific.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|