jazz2future wrote:
I am absolutely thrilled to be giving a gleaming report about a PAL disc.
In 2000 I started collecting LDs because I could get them cheaper than the DVD. I slowly, and with the help of a great player learned their value. Now I approach PAL discs the same, mostly buying music discs that are too expensive in their Japanese counterparts.
So for the same reason I bought this French Gaumont pressing. And it looks just fine, and sounds great. I immensely prefer this long version to the one i know.. The shorter version just plainly doesn't give enough time for their relationship to fully mature, and I always thought, now why did he have to go get himself killed?? But this was just perfect.
Does the PAL 4% speed up bother you at all? And have you ever compared a PAL disc release to its US or Japanese counterpart? Although I own a few PAL discs from the original 1982 launch and later 1990's pressings, I've never been able to watch them since I don't own a PAL player, but I've heard many complaints about PAL discs being conversions of NTSC titles instead of true 625 line 25fps transfers and want to know how they fare.
I have some PAL DVD's (the whole Bionic Woman set and Microsoft's test DVD) and the speed up of the sound drives me crazy - I just can't adjust to it. When I went on vacation in 1990 to England and France/Germany, etc... The speed up and 50 Hz flicker (flicker which I know doesn't exist anymore) of PAL and SECAM TV really bothered me - but I thought SECAM's pic quality was wonderful - too bad there was never any true SECAM discs made.
Do any modern sets do PAL-Plus, and if so, do you own any of the few PAL-Plus discs that were issued? Germany started the whole PAL-Plus program and utilized it the most so I've wondered if companies have kept it in modern sets. The closest the US got to a true EDTV system like PAL-Plus is the Faroudja SuperNTSC system and besides LD's, NBC and other networks used it, but it didn't add any resolution or have a 16:9 compatible aspect ratio.