The HK SACDs have a little controversy about them.
Some were suspected to be simply CD 44.1Kz/16bit up-sampled to DXD/DSD to sell the same contents at a higher price.
The constant "Made in Japan" marketing gimmick is quite suspicious as well... It cleverly avoids the "Remastered in Japan".
It does happen a lot when the original songs were recorded PCM -- no other sources -- in the 90's.
Or when the publishers are just lazily recycling recent over-compressed remasters -- that are not a good fit for SACD.
The extracted files' DR (Dynamic Range) value usually gives it away.
Example for T
ears for Fears: the DR values of the 1992 CD are slightly better than the SACD values (maybe CD layer?).
CD
https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/view/202647SACD
https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/view/207944Clearly not a good remaster/a remaster at all, they just increased the volume to the point of clipping.
Maroon 5 - Singleshttps://dr.loudness-war.info/album/view/217748DR values are HORRIBLE on the CD layer, I wouldn't expect the SACD to be any better.
https://archimago.blogspot.com/2013/07/list-suspected-44-or-48khz-pcm.htmlhttps://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/sacd-are-you-surprised-at-the-formats-recent-resurgence.257302/page-107#post-36213880https://www.discogs.com/release/31855574-Maroon-5-SinglesOnly deserves 4 stars. Overcompressed and mastered too bright. There should only be a few mastering engineers allowed to do the mastering for SACDshttps://www.discogs.com/release/28082680-The-Cure-Greatest-HitsThe same tracks sound better on my 80s compilation cd 'staring at the sea' which is like 3 euros. Dont give these people your money. This is the same bad master as the brickwalled original CD. Lazy and pointlessThey typically don't sell well on Japanese 2nd-hand market, and are not mass-imported to Japan.
Japanese buyers avoid them.
I sadly don't own any to extract/analyze/compare by myself.
I would say "buyer beware", you might be buying a fancied-up, over-priced, over-compressed CD release.
Julien