|
It is currently 04 Jul 2024, 04:11
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
rein-o
|
Post subject: Re: The Laserdisc Screenshot Thread  Posted: 29 Jun 2024, 20:55 |
| Jedi Master |
 |
 |
Joined: 03 May 2004, 19:05 Posts: 8156 Location: Dullaware Has thanked: 1269 times Been thanked: 875 times
|
jesuslovesgood wrote: takeshi666 wrote: My only hope is that when/if I ever get a capture card, I can take better screencaps than these. These look that bad on your monitor? I don't think they look that bad. They do. They look softer than what I see on my TV when I play an LD.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rcarlson
|
Post subject: Re: The Laserdisc Screenshot Thread  Posted: 30 Jun 2024, 18:13 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 02 Jan 2021, 00:35 Posts: 261 Location: Northern Virginia Has thanked: 174 times Been thanked: 163 times
|
|
You keep talking about analog video like it's magic. It isn't. Just because it uses voltage levels instead of integers doesn't mean it has infinitely fine precision or "effectively unlimited subtlety." Color in analog video is in fact extremely limited in subtlety because the equipment to record and reproduce it simply isn't that good.
And even if you're thinking about a color gradient on a single scanline displayed on a CRT, it's not like you're actually going to see a perfectly smooth transition from one shade to the other because you've got red, green, and blue phosphors breaking it up. That's not even taking into account the variation in how correct those shades are going to be just from noise and the state of the equipment.
Now flip the gradient so it's going vertically. Whether you're talking digital or analog, NTSC or PAL, interlaced or progressive, you're looking at a fixed number of horizontal lines on the screen that can make up that gradient. It's not going to make a bit of difference whether each line is fed a digital signal or an analog one: The number of lines is how many steps there are going to be in that gradient at a given moment. Not continuous, not infinitely precise, not magic.
I don't know why I'm writing any of this when it isn't going to change anyone's mind. Guess it's like scratching an itch.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jesuslovesgood
|
Post subject: Re: The Laserdisc Screenshot Thread  Posted: 02 Jul 2024, 19:35 |
| True fan |
 |
 |
Joined: 06 Jan 2020, 18:00 Posts: 434 Location: United States Has thanked: 387 times Been thanked: 49 times
|
rein-o wrote: jesuslovesgood wrote: takeshi666 wrote: My only hope is that when/if I ever get a capture card, I can take better screencaps than these. These look that bad on your monitor? I don't think they look that bad. They do. They look softer than what I see on my TV when I play an LD. I do see what you mean. I think Hauppauge PVR is causing it to be softer looking. What could I do to combat that? Maybe turn the sharpness up all the way on my CLD-99? I have the remote that works with it and I believe there's a setting to increase sharpness or would this be pretty much pointless because whatever Hauppuage PVR is doing is causing it to blur a little?
_________________ CLD-99, CLD-3080, CLD-53, and LX-900
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|