|
It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 12:03
|
View unsolved topics | View unanswered posts
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
tshephard
|
Post subject: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 08 Jul 2020, 22:08 |
Honest fan |
|
|
Joined: 16 Mar 2014, 01:05 Posts: 93 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 0 time
|
2 potential issues (everything else seems to work great):
A On Stop/Eject, panel or remote, system seems to take 25 seconds to follow command. I hear it stop, 25 seconds later a click and eject. (I thought pad/grip, but not for 25 secs... cleaned it anyway.)
B I have to be very particular with setting LD in tray hole. It will always work after a rejection and re-command Play without touching it, but often not on first tray insertion. (Maybe the system wiggles it in tray, why I started settling better in hole.) When it doesn't work, it makes a high pitched noise, I call it a Toshiba noise like an industrial motor drive, before ejection.
Anyone know these symptoms? Just the way they work?
THX
|
|
|
|
|
blam1
|
Post subject: Re: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 22 Jul 2020, 01:06 |
Advanced fan |
|
|
Joined: 21 Dec 2002, 18:44 Posts: 959 Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 122 times
|
deadlegion wrote: So is it SCQ3.6 or SCQ3.8 ? Both will "technically" work, but the 3.8 belt will fail more quickly as it wears out.
|
|
|
|
|
tshephard
|
Post subject: Re: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 12:48 |
Honest fan |
|
|
Joined: 16 Mar 2014, 01:05 Posts: 93 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 0 time
|
blam1 - as it wears out ?
So - I 'needed' 2, so I ordered one of each - a 3.6 and a 3.8, BOTH sellers fumbled, only 1 here so far...
I am basically 'repairing' a 704 for sale, per previous complaint.
I also notice the newish belt crossover exchanges the Pio part for a 4.0 belt?
Likely all would work, and 3.6 would last longest or shortest? (I don't 'know' pure rubber, non-fiber belts.)
I would guess.... 3.6 initially stretched to fit would be slimmer in use, and fail to critical thinness fastest. 4.0 would remain 'fattest' in initial use, and last longest...?
Overall - do belts wear thin or stretch out thin due to repeated torque?
THX any, all....
|
|
|
|
|
odotb3
|
Post subject: Re: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 16:07 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jul 2014, 20:59 Posts: 298 Location: North London Has thanked: 79 times Been thanked: 97 times
|
tshephard wrote: Overall - do belts wear thin or stretch out thin due to repeated torque? They do indeed. I changed the belt in my 925 not too long ago and the replacement was much smaller/tighter. The old one had stretched and become loose over time, not providing the right torque.
|
|
|
|
|
odotb3
|
Post subject: Re: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 01 Aug 2020, 10:56 |
True fan |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jul 2014, 20:59 Posts: 298 Location: North London Has thanked: 79 times Been thanked: 97 times
|
tshephard wrote: Was the failure length change or thinning? Yes it had stretched over time and became thinner and more loose. Eventually not providing any torque.
|
|
|
|
|
tshephard
|
Post subject: Re: [CLD-D704] Support? Posted: 03 Aug 2020, 17:28 |
Honest fan |
|
|
Joined: 16 Mar 2014, 01:05 Posts: 93 Location: United States Has thanked: 2 times Been thanked: 0 time
|
rein-o wrote: I take it you've never had this issue before with LP turntables, Tapedecks, VCRs, Automobiles etc. Nope - my experience is hard as a rock or melted, probably attics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|